Digital Inequality and Social Stratification in the Era of Platform Society: A Sociological Analysis of Urban Youth in Indonesia.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65739/archipel.v1i6.35Keywords:
digital inequality, platform society, social stratificationAbstract
This study examines the relationship between digital inequality and social stratification in the context of platform society among urban Indonesian youth using a qualitative interpretive approach with a critical-constructivist paradigm. Through a multi-site case study in South Jakarta, North Jakarta, and Depok with 30–40 informants aged 18–30 years, data were collected via in-depth interviews, participant observation, focus group discussions, and document studies. Data were then analyzed using thematic analysis, Fairclough's critical discourse analysis, and Bourdieu's field analysis. The findings reveal that digital inequality operates in layers at the level of physical access, skills gaps, and socio-economic benefits that cumulatively reinforce the existing class structure. The platform society ecosystem is proven to function as a social reproduction engine through three simultaneous mechanisms: algorithmic, habitus, and political economy. This study introduces the concept of digital habitus stratification to explain how class-structured digital dispositions are internalized transgenerationally, and the Platform-Mediated Social Reproduction model as a new analytical framework. The findings also identify the hierarchies of platform capitalism that lock lower-class youth into digital precariatization and class-based segregation of information ecosystems. This research concludes that solutions to digital inequality require transformative-ecological policies that address the broader structural roots of social inequality.
References
Al Makmun, M. T. (2024). Globalization and the Changing Cultural Landscape of an Indonesian City: Street Vending Cultural Practices and Spatiotemporal Politics in Solo City (1980s-2020s). Bowling Green State University.
Amalyah, A. (2025). Transformation of Social Structure in Digital Society: Analysis of Network Sociology. Mahogany Journal De Social, 2(3), 130-140.
Cini, L. (2023). How algorithms are reshaping the exploitation of labour-power: insights into the process of labour invisibilization in the platform economy. Theory and society, 52(5), 885-911.
Cotter, K. (2021). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912530
Fathilah, S. A., Fitrayani, A., & Bahtiar, S. (2025). Konstruksi Realitas Sosial melalui Algoritma Media Digital dalam Perspektif Ilmu Sosial Modern Indonesia. PERSEPTIF: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 3(4), 174-182.
Graham, M., & Dutton, W. H. (2021). Society and the internet (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843498.001.0001
Hamidah, F., Hartanto, R., & Hadi, K. (2025). Perubahan Relasi Gender di Ruang Kerja Digital berdasarkan Analisis Ilmu Sosial Aktual. PERSEPTIF: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 3(4), 147-155.
Luhuringbudi, T., Kurniawan, E., Ahmad, H., Muhtar, A., & Abdillah, R. I. (2025). Modest Modernities: Muslim Identity, Globalisation, and Urban Transformation in Indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 20(1), 207-234.
Mafaza, D., Salsabila, H. L., & Agustim, Z. M. (2025). Rekonstruksi Analisis Struktur Sosial Melalui Pendekatan Sistem Kompleks Untuk Mengatasi Keterbatasan Model Klasik Dalam Membaca Dinamika Masyarakat Digital Kontemporer. Menulis: Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 1(11), 81-88.
Mubarok, A. (2025). Social Inequality and Digital Economic Transformation: A Study of Access, Opportunity, and Social Justice in Urban Societies. Archipel: Journal of Indonesian Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(2), 42-50.
Peker, Ş. N. K. (2025). INTERSECTIONALITY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT DISCOURSE AND INEQUALITY: ASSESSING THE POSITION OF WOMEN IN DIGITAL ECONOMY. Uluslararası Toplumsal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 142-167.
Pignot, E. (2023). Who is pulling the strings in the platform economy? Accounting for the dark and unexpected sides of algorithmic control. Organization, 30(1), 140-167.
Rachmaniah, R. (2025). Motif Penggunaan TikTok di Kalangan Pelajar: Analisis Uses and Gratification dalam Konteks Literasi Media Digital Remaja Semi-Urban. JINTACT: Journal of Interactive Communicaton, Public Relations and Broadcasting, 1(1), 1-16.
Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Dunn, H. S., et al. (2020). Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age. First Monday, 25(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i7.10842
Sadowski, J. (2020). Too smart: How digital capitalism is extracting data, controlling our lives, and taking over the world. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12240.001.0001
Sitompul, H. B., Sebayang, S. K. B., Rozaini, N., & Nugrahad, E. W. (2025). TRANSFORMASI PASAR TENAGA KERJA DI ERA DIGITAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF PEKERJA MUDA. LintekEdu: Jurnal Literasi dan Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(4).
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2020). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the gig economy. Work, Employment & Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
Yasmine, D. I., Colombijn, F., Deursen, A. J. V., & van Ingen, E. (2025). Internet skills, digital engagement, and outcomes among urban youth in Jakarta, Indonesia: incorporating a Global South context in measuring digital inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 28(15), 2774-2794.
Yatno, T. (2025). Social Class Dynamics in the Digital Age: The Influence of Technology on Social Stratification. STRATEGISH Journal, 1(1), 45-53.
Zheng, Y., & Walsham, G. (2021). Inequality of what? An intersectional approach to digital inequality under Covid-19. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100341..
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Mubarok
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
