Policy Framework for Enhancing Public Service Provision in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: Including Public Communication in Regional Development Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65739/archipel.v1i10.50Keywords:
public service delivery, public communication, regional development management, participatory administrationAbstract
Public communication is a key feature of good regional governance, but one that is often neglected early in the development of decentralized systems. The aim of our research is to find out whether poor communication is a factor for the failure of the development programs to reach the people in East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) Province, Indonesia. The study adopted an explanatory mixed-methods design. A survey was conducted on 210 community members in three districts in NTT namely Kupang, Ende and Flores Timur. Secondary data were obtained from 24 policy papers, government reports, statistical publications and institutional related documents.What we found was a system straining in many ways at once: disjointed institutional structures, chronically underfunded Diskominfo offices, more than 80 local languages that are simply out of reach of standard Indonesian-language messages, and a deep lack of trust between the government and the populace that erodes even genuine attempts at communication. At the same time, a handful of local initiatives – district transparency portals, village-level communication coordinators, and community radio stations – gave a glimpse of what is possible when communication is woven into governance from the outset, rather than just tacked on. The findings informed the design of the Strategic Public Communication Framework (SPCF), a five-pillar model developed for the specific needs of NTT and adaptable to other peripheral administrations in other Asia-Pacific regions.
Downloads
References
Alam Siddiquee, N. (2010). Managing for results: lessons from public management reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(1), 38-53.
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia, or APJII. (2023). Indonesian internet user survey results for 2023. APJII.
Bappeda Kabupaten Kupang. (2023). Evaluasi Program Koordinator Komunikasi Desa Kabupaten Kupang 2022–2023 [Laporan tidak diterbitkan]. Pemerintah Kabupaten Kupang.
Bappenas. (2022). Program evaluation for public communication in the Province of Papua from 2019 to 2022. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Bappenas.
BPS NTT. (2023). Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi NTT. https://ntt.bps.go.id
BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2023). Persentase miskin menurut provinsi 2023. Pusat Statistik Badan.
Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. 2006. Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. 2018. Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Canel, M. J., & Luoma-Aho, V. (2019). Public sector communication: Closing gaps between citizens and public organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
Chatora, A. (2012). Encouraging Political Participation in Africa: The Potential of Social Media Platforms. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dwiyanto, A. (2011). Mengembalikan Kepercayaan Publik melalui Reformasi Birokrasi. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Graber, D. A. (2003). The Power of Communication: Managing Information in Public Organizations. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hofman, B., & Kaiser, K. (2004). The making of the big bang and its aftermath: A political economy perspective. In Reforming Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and the Rebuilding of Indonesia. Edward Elga
Huque, A. S., & Ferdous, J. (2024). Electronic public service delivery: progress and challenges in Bangladesh. Public Administration and Policy, 27(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-06-2023-0090
Kemenkominfo. (2021). Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Fungsi Komunikasi Publik Pemerintah Daerah. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia.
Lagrada, H. D., & Santiago, A. B. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy of disaster risk reduction and management approaches of Metro Manila local government units. Public Administration and Policy, 27(1), 55–72.
Lembaga Survei Indonesia (LSI). (2023). Survei Kepercayaan Publik terhadap Pemerintah 2023. LSI. https://lsi.or.id
Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2020). Assessing the impact of co-production on pathways to outcomes in public services: The case of policing and criminal justice. International Public Management Journal, 23(2), 205-223.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. MIT Press.
Myers, M. (2008). Radio and Development in Africa: A Concept Paper. International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
NTT RPJMD 2018–2023. (2018). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur 2018–2023. Pemerintah Provinsi NTT.
NTT RPJMD 2025–2029. (2025). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur 2025–2029. Pemerintah Provinsi NTT.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.
Purwanto, E. A., Kumorotomo, W., and Setiadi, A. (2021). A configurational analysis of decentralization, capacity building, and development results in Indonesian districts. 47(6), 1012–1034; Local Government Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1888400
Rahman, M. H. (2021). Digital communication between citizens and governments in developing Asia: acceptance of e-services, inclusion, and trust. 43(1), 34–57, Asian Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.2021.1903218
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Pres
Secretariat of ASEAN. (2023). The 2023 ASEAN Smart Cities Network (ASCN) progress report. Secretariat of ASEAN.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Servaes, J. (1999). Communication for Development: One World, Multiple Cultures. Hampton Press.
Star, S. L., Bowker, G. C., Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTs.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics. American Economic Review, 92(3), 460–501.
Thaens, M., and Meijer, A. (2022). Quantified street: The government's role in addressing information asymmetry in urban governance using smart technology. 24(10), 1549–1566; Public Management Review.
World Bank. (2021). Indonesia Public Expenditure Review 2021: Investing in improved outcomes. World Bank Organization.
Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., & Zhao, M. (2023). Negativity bias in welfare policy feedback effects on mass publics. Governance, 36(4), 1015-1043.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Noverius H Nggili, Mariano A T Nugraha, Sirilus N M Lelan, Yuan V Elim, Adellia Agusta, Descorina Priscillia Br. Sitompul, Roidah ‘Afro’, Dalmasius Naif, Selsus Terselly Djese, Nur Julqurniati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
